Today's News
Monthly News
More...
 
The Media and Conflicts
Articles
More...
 
SAARC Law
Summit Declaration
More...
 
Colonialism and migration
Migration patterns
More...
 
Political Condition
Political Challenges
More...
 
Retired Foreign Service
South Asia in Crisis
More..
 
Association
Friends of South Asia (FOSA)
More...
 
Business
Opportunities
More...
 
 
Communal Harmony
 
SITE MAP | CONTACT US | ABOUT US  



 
Trade and Economy Tourism Commentary Photo Gallery Archive
     
 
 
CAN INDIA BE A THEOLOGICAL STATE?
Brigadier General M. Sakhawat Hussain(retd)

Indian state of Gujrat is in flame. The state capital, Ahmedabad has witnessed one of the worst kind of communal violence in years that resulted into over 300 dead mostly being Muslims.. Gujrat’s history is marred with occasional communal violence but not at the scale that started on February 28,2002 as sequel to the gruesome act in Godhra that left 64 people were churned inside train bogies that was carrying “Kar Sevaks”( labours for construction of Ram Mandir) to Ayodhya. It was reported that the worst kind of incidence that took place at Godhra railway station has been initiated by the Muslim community of the area though no formal investigation is completed. This “Kar Sevaks” was going to Ayodhya for stone laying ceremony of Ram Mandir as declared earlier. The BJP president in a recent press conference stated that both ISI of Pakistan and the congress have hand in the incidence. Whatever may be the case the fact remains that BJP ruling elite both at the center and in the states of Gujrat has failed to protect the secular image of India. There has been enough warning from VHP (Vishwa Hindu Parishad) and the “Ram Janmabhumi Binnayas”(god Ram’s birthplace reconstruction) chief Mr. Paramhangsha Ramchandra when both declared to March towards Ayodhya, UP (Uttar Pradesh) for completing the unfinished task of constructing temple on the site of demolished Babri Mosque site. The issue became an election manifesto for ruling BJP state government that they lost. BJP’s dismal performance in four states specially that of in UP is seen as the decline of Bop’s hold on to the power in the center. It was VHP that still remains a driving force behind BJP’s political strength and Ayodhya issue has been the test case for rise of extreme Hindu nationalism in once known to be the secular democracy of India.
The Vishawa Hindu Parishad (VHP), a Hindu extremist group connected to the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), was pressing ahead with plans to construct a temple to the Hindu god Ram in the northern Indian city of Ayodhya. The VHP insists on building the temple on the site of the Babri Masjid (mosque), which was torn down by Hindu fanatics in 1992. The campaign threatens to fan religious communalism in the region right at the point when India and Pakistan are engaged in a tense military standoff. This comes at a time when the governments of India’s neighbouring countries are trying to grapple with the existing religious extremists those are otherwise challenging the authorities.
Earlier the VHP had set a deadline of March 12 for the BJP-led government to hand over the land to allow the construction to begin. As the party was facing crucial elections in few key states, BJP could not support such unfavorable demand when the party candidates were wooing the minority Muslim votes specially in UP but did not come heavily on VHP. However, to press their demands, Hindu fanatics initiated a march from Ayodhya to New Delhi late last month that drew considerable support from hard-liner Hindu supporters. So- called “Karsevaks” has started gathering in Ayodhya (one report now suggests that they have been told to leave Ayodhya). VHP, along with yet another Hindu militant organisation, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), mobilised physically destroy the mosque in 1992 that sparked Hindu Muslim riot all over the Subcontinent that included Bangladesh. In a fact that was worst kind of sectarian violence since the independence of the country other wise known to be most tolerant society than other major countries of the region. India saw a worst type of violence in the form of Mumbai (Bombay) riot preceded by famously known as Bombay blast.
The disputed mosque area where Hindu extremists claim to be the birthplace of pre-Christ Hindu god Ram, has been placed with Indian government to decide. At least that was the verdict given by the Supreme Court. Since then the BJP led government has constantly been playing the Rammandir card to its advantage as and when needed. The current Indo-Pak scenario and the state elections that may not go well as far as BJP’s hold is concerned made the Delhi government hesitant to replay the old tune with RSS. That however, does not preclude Mr. LK Advani’s rhetoric on the issue. Many analysts think that it is Mr. Advani’ s unfinished agenda that VHP is pursuing.
Whatever, is the government stand on the issue for the time being, VHP, in an announced that they may consider government’s plea to abandon the 15th March 2002 program with few string attached to it. It demanded the central government to provide a firm date for allowing to construct the Mandir. Though the Indian prim-minister has appealed to the nation for calm but he is aware that his government’s claim of communal harmony and secularism has come under sharp criticism both at home and abroad. The political opposition to BJP mainly Congress and other left parties blames ruling party for not controlling the Hindu extremism that is questioning India’s secularism every now and then. Mr. Atal Bihari Bajpayee realises the damage these incidence has done to his and his country’s image under the changed world scenario. The current violence would be viewed very differently then 1993 Mumbai riot that killed 600 people in one city alone. The current violence could have been prevented if pre-emptive steps were taken. To many Indian analysts the BJP wanted to rip the Hindu sentimental support for BJP governemnt in UP. But that did not happen. At least the aspirants of Samajbadi Party that BJP and the central government allowed tge situation slip out of their hand. Prim-minister’s appeal considered being too late. The incidence and heighten tension comes at a time when Samajbadi Party led by Mulyam Singh Yadav is trying to form a coalition government for state. The incidence could be the beginning of trouble that may lie ahead of Mr. Mulyam Singh. Meanwhile VHP is defiant of any restriction that may be imposed by the central government. The issue that has repeatedly seen worst communal violence is highly inflammatory one. The repeated communal riots may spark fresh violence that would not remain confined to India alone. 1992 incidence that left scars all over the subcontinent but 2002 is different climate all together.
Incidences in Ayodhya may go well with the religious extremist across the board. US war against terror has already provided the religious extremists’ reasons for originate situations that would put governments into defensive or least embarrassed, Kidnapping of Wall Street journal reporter Daniel Pearl in Karachi a case in point.
What it seems now that since September 11, 2001 the Hinduism in India has been boosted to a new height particularly in Indian politics. The insistence of string up yet another controversy seems to indicate the same in a very trying situation. Not only that at government level India and its media, if not as strongly as Pakistan, also roping in Bangladesh in painting the existence of religious extremist who as Indian media puts it, “is harbouring, training extremists and insurgents to operate against India” in alliance with ISI. This is a serious charge that the Indian media has leveled so far. Only few months back the Indian media projected Bangladeshi government is becoming communal and demanded safety of the minority community. With the current communal violence in India the government of Bangladesh has been forced to take preventive measures. We hope that no untoward incidence is ever repeated in this country where communal harmony is the way of Bengali culture.
It is unfortunate that the Hindu fundamentalism is in rapid rise in once known and regarded to be a secular India. It is not only in case of Babri Mosque that these zealots are aiming but also in most cases started to denying the Moghul period of Indian history as Muslim occupation. These extremists claim that Mir Baqi, one of the Mogul Emperor Babur’s generals, built the mosque in the 16th century after razing a Hindu temple. According to RSS the destruction of the mosque is first step to put the history in correct perspective, Muslims in the sub-continent are the remnant of eighth century invasion of India. One of the prominent RSS leaders S. Sudarshan makes no pretension when he retorts, Muslims in India, who number in the tens of millions, “must accept the ‘culture’ of the majority community”. According to these zealots, all the mosques built in India by Muslim rulers that of prominence are on disputed land that once housed Hindu temples of significance. Only in October last that members of the BJP’s youth organisation went one step further and tried to deface marble that covers the Taj Mahal, built in the 17th century by the Mughal emperor Shah Jahan. According to these goons the world famous landmark is also built in place of a temple.
Advani and other BJP leaders faced charges for their direct involvement in the demolition of the Babri Masjid but none have ever been convicted. Earlier these leaders including Mr. Bajpayee had taken oath with RSS, “For the betterment of my sacred Hindu religion, Hindu culture, and Hindu community, I will devote myself to the prosperity of my Holy Motherland.” The leaders include most prominently, Mr. LK Advani, however none was convicted though he is regarded to be leading the hawks in BJP as earlier described the destruction act as “the happiest moment” of his life.
Vajpayee has so far denied VHP’s decree and also denied that any promise was ever made to the Parishad to a solution before deadline given by the Hindu extremists. He reminded these ‘Sants’ to respect the rule of law and warned that any attempt to flout the courts could create a law-and-order problem. The hard-liner Advani the home minister, called on the VHP to follow the Prime Minister’s advice.
“There are several reasons for the BJP’s apparent reluctance to openly push the Ayodhya issue”, quips one of the leading expert on Indian the government policy. The party does not hold a majority in parliament and only took office in 1998 with the support of a number of minor, regional based parties. To form the National Democratic Alliance (NDA), the BJP had to shelve parts of its Hindu communalism agenda, including the building of the Ram temple, as its coalition parties were concerned about losing the Muslim vote. Of late BJP is besieged with multifarious problems. One of the issues is failure of controlling the on going terrorism that is associated with the Kashmir issue in the heartland of India. The other big issue is the politico-military imbroglio with its other nuclear neighbour i.e. Pakistan.
For many BJP has failed to usher in the economic miracle that it promised to deliver rather the defence expenditure has had a quantum jump in last few years. On the other hand opposition challenge to the ruling coalition has grown to a size that is exposing the government corruption to the public. The government is extremely concerned that any widespread outbreak of communal violence could undermine the agenda of privatisation and cutbacks to social spending, and inhibit the flow of foreign investment. Keeping all these larger sections of media and the Indian social activists are urging the government to take tougher action on these fundamentalists. One hopes that sanity would prevail on Indian masses those would not like to be the hostage in the hand of Hindu chauvinists and mar the Indian secular image any further. Let us hope that politics is kept above communalism as many in India feels that BJP rode to power on the wave of Hindutava but currently the same wave is about to wash away the hold of BJP in Indian body politick.
Communal forces must be stop irrespective of countries of the Sub-continent. Failing to control these elements would rather give opportunity for rise ultra- religious extremism elsewhere. Gruesome murder of Denial Pearl by Pakistani extremists is a case in point.

(Writer a freelance columnist, strategic, security and defence analyst)
Indian Muslims - An Oppressed Minority
By Abdul Haq
India has a unique experience of Muslim minority. A dominant minority in the medieval period became a dominated minority, all of a sudden with the advent of British rule in India. This sudden change resulted into complex problems. Partition of sub-continent in Aug 47 converted the Muslim community of India into 'Pakistani Muslims' and 'Indian Muslims'. This was a great shock as far as Indian Muslims are concerned. The rulers of Yesterday, now had to live under the 'Hindu rule'. Fifty years having passed, the Muslims who opted to stay in India are still getting a raw deal in every sphere of life. They are still drowned in the scourge of poverty and backwardness. They continue fighting the ever-hunting spectra of communal riots and threats to their religious and cultural identity. The sense of insecurity experienced by the Indian Muslims in the post partition period has been compounded in recent years by the state repression and terrorism under the 'draconian', Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA). Under this act 7,9332 people, mostly Muslims were detained and tortured during 1990-95 across the country. Though the Act has been repealed, yet about 5000 persons, mostly Muslims, are still in jails.
Hinduism and Islam

Dr Balraj Madhok, former Professor of history at Delhi University while explaining the term 'Hindu' said, "Everyone living in India is a Hindu. Hinduism is no religion, it is the name of a civilization (Tahzib), a way of life." He further said that, "Whereas his (Madhok's) nationality is Hindu, his (Madhok's) religion is Vedic Dharmi". While giving an interview to 'New York Times' correspondent at Delhi in 1966, he said, "In this country we have never insisted on religious conformity and we are not going to start now. However, one thing we do insist on, is that Muslims become Indians. They can worship as they like, but they must adopt this country's customs as their customs." What all it means for Muslims is that Hinduism is not so much a religion as it is a way of life. It prescribes not only how a man must pray, but also how he must eat, dress, converse, work and die. On the other hand Islam is much more than this. While asking a Muslim to give up all but his mosque and adopt the Indian way of life, is virtually demanding that he should give up Islam and become Hindu. Nobody can dispute that the Muslims have individually and collectively the duty and responsibility to mould their personal and social lives in accordance with the dictates of Islam, which is a perfect way of life, better than any religion in the world.

Birth of Hindu Revivalism
The Hindu reformers of the 19th century were the pioneers of Hindu renaissance. foremost among them was Raja Rammohan Roy (1772-1833) the founder of Brahmo Samaj, which represented the first throb of modernism in Hinduism. A great admirer of Muslim thought, he had been deeply influenced by his study of Islamic works (including Quran) and by Sufism. Yet at heart he was a staunch Hindu. His deepest yearnings were to turn the Hindus back to the Vedas. He was thus one of the founders of modern Hindu nationalism. The message of Rammohan Roy was carried further by Dayananda-Saraswati, a Gujrati Brahman (1824-1883), who openly raised the slogan 'India for the Hindus.' According to him, Hinduism was to be the sole religion of the sub-continent, and the Hindus its sole masters. The Muslims were foreigners and must be pushed out. He devised a new weapon to fight the Muslims. It was the weapon of 'Shuddhi' or individual conversion of Muslims to Hindu faith. After the partition of India in Aug 47, thousands of Muslims were butchered cold blooded and forced to leave India. Since then, Hindu militant Bal Thackeray of Shiv Sena and other militant Hindu organiztions are of the opinion that Muslims have their own homeland in the shape of Pakistan (though they do not accept it from their hearts), therefore they have no right to live in India.

Alienation of Muslims
In terms of numbers, the Muslims are only next to the Hindus, totaling 95.2 million (1991 census) and constituting about 12 percent of the population, yet they are considered by the Hindus even less important than the Jains and Buddhists who are only 0.43 and 0.41 percent of the population respectively (1991 census). A prominent Hindu writer S. Harrison admits that the dominant note in the Hindu attitude towards Muslim today is that, "Hindus have a natural right to rule in modern India as a form of long overdue retribution for the sins of the Mughal overlords. It is not enough that unified state with a Hindu majority, clearly dominant over a Muslim minority now reduced to 12 percent, has been established at long last in the Indian sub-continent. The fulfillment of Indian nationalism requires an assertion of Hindu hegemony over the Muslims of the subcontinent in one form or the other." The cumulative outcome of all this is that according to Jai Prakash Narayan, "The Muslim population has been so much cowed and demoralized that they are not acting according to their convictions. They are afraid that if they expressed their real feelings, their loyalty will be suspected."

Interference in Muslim Religion
Apart from being made to suffer a host of disabilities, political, cultural and economic; the Indian Muslims have often been subjected to a campaign of interference with their religion as well. It usually takes the form of slanderous attacks on Islam made in school text books, or in the press, desecration of mosques and shrines, or deliberate incitement of feelings of religious hatered against the Muslims. In most of the Hindu dominated Indian states, Hindu religious beliefs, philosophy and methodology have been introduced into the text books in the name of Indian culture. This is to an extent that a glance through the officially prescribed school text books leaves an impression that those responsible for them regard India (a multi religious country) as the home of Brahmans and attach value only to their deities, temples, religious customs and practices.

Adverse propaganda against Islam
The books dealing with the heritage of India exclusively enumerate Hindu heritage and gloss over everything Muslim. The Muslim heroes in medieval Indian history have been treated as 'aliens' and 'strangers', the book 'Hamara Purwaj' prescribed for classes VI, VII and VIII in the state of Uttar Pradesh is an instance of such unfair treatment. A text book on history approved by Bihar State Government entitled 'Gayania Uday Basic Itihas' carries an alleged picture of the Holy Prophet under the caption 'Eishwar Ke Peghamber-Hazrat Mohammad.' The author makes the statement that the Quran was written by the Prophet himself. It is not only contrary to the Muslim belief but also an adverse propaganda against Islam. The book also makes indecent remarks about Hazrat Khadija, one of the Prophet's wives. In Rajasthan as well, text book prescribed in Schools contain derogatory references against the Holy Prophet. The Director of education Rajasthan, issued instructions to authors to see, "That lessons in India and other subjects deal with the importance of cow at all stages in a suitable manner." The content of prayers recited in state schools is also very objectionable, grossly violating the constitutional guarantee of religious freedom so far as Muslims are concerned.

Desecration of Mosques and Shrines
Countless incidents can be cited of the desecration of mosques by the Hindu communalists during the last few decades. In 1961, the Indian Rehabilitation Minister made the claim that all the mosques and graveyards had been resorted to the Muslims. Refuting this statement, Maulana Hifzur Rahman produced a long list of mosques and graveyards not restored to the Muslims but had been auctioned by the Rehabilitation department. Some of the names of mosques and shrines mentioned in the list are Masjid Qazi Serai (near Thana Mehrauli), Masjid Begampur Khurd (near Kalu Serai), Masjid Chuna Mandi, Masjid Mantola Pahrargang (Delhi), Masjid Qabrastan Golebazar, (Thana Reading road, Delhi), Masjid Thana Civil Lines Delhi.Qabrastan village Ladha Serai, Mehrauli, Qabrastan near Dargah Hazrat Khwaja Qutbuddin), Qabrastan behind Thana corporation office, (Mehrauli), Qabrastan East of Eidgah, (Mehrauli), Qabrastan Gurgaon road, Qabrastan Gole Market, Thana Reading Road, (Delhi), and Qabrastan Motia Khan, Pahargang (Delhi).

Tragedy of Babri Mosque
The 16th century historic Babri mosque was razed to ground by thousands of Hindu fanatics in Ayodhya, (UP) on 16th Dec 92. According to Indian media reports, the Hindu Zealosts and India's one of the largest Hindu fundamentalist political party BJP are again threatening to build a grand temple on the rubble of this mosque. Hindu fundamentalists openly announce that they would, "Purify India of Muslim remnants." It was during 1949 when Babri Masjid was first raided. A group of vandals entered the mosque and placed the idol of Ramlallah. The successive Indian governments patronized the Hindu fundamentalists under different garbs, which ultimately turned into an uncontrollable demon.

Responsibility of the tragedy
It is an established fact that the government of India did not take any action to disperse the mob despite the fact that it was aware of the heinous designs of the unholy gathering. Instead of saving the mosque from destruction a number of government officials were reported to have watched the scene gleefully, inciting the mob to deliver a final blow to bring down the structure. The reluctance of government to either call in the army or Central Reserve Police to protect the mosque, spoke of understanding between Shiv Sena and the Union government of the Congress. Reports indicated that the assault on the mosque was effectively abetted by the guards. An Indian journalist Yuvraj Mohite, while recording his statement in the court of Mumbai said, "Bal Thackeray, founder of Shiva Sena ordered the massacre in Dec 1992 after the demolition of Babri Mosque. The double-dealing Congress Ministry of the then Prime Minister Narasimha Rao at the centre did almost nothing to prevent the destruction of 450 years old Babri Mosque by the BJP-VHP and other anti Muslim elements". 'The Statesman' of new Delhi (2 Dec 92) reported, "The VHP and Bajrang Dal cadres were taught demolition methods by a retired Brig of the Indian Army in a month long training camp in a Hindu village in Gujrat State and that the State government had full Knowledge of it". Some Indian Newspapers reported that India's intelligence agencies had informed Narasimha Rao government's Home Ministry about the specially trained squads raised by the BJP and VHP cohorts to destroy the mosque but the then Home Minister, Chavan, showed utter indifference and hypocrisy.

BJP vs Indian Muslims
The Upsurge of Hindu fundamentalism in the states under the BJP's rule, Rajisthan, Haryana, East Punjab and Delhi has been a source of serious concern to the Muslim minority there. But the resurrection of the BJP's rule over Utter Pradesh, India's most populous state with a sizable Muslim community, since late Sep this year has sent a shiver of apprehensions among the Muslim minority. As the top ranking BJP leader and the man behind the tragedy of Babri Mosque, Kalyan Singh is now again in power in this state. The hard line Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Manohar Joshi, a member of the BJP's ruling echelon, punished the state government secretary for cultural affairs, Govind Swaroop, a broadminded civil servant, for including Mr. Jinnah (Quaid-e-Azam) in a list of India's freedom fighters for a TV documentary film and for ranking him with Mr.Gandhi and Nehru in the fight against the British. Shiv Sena, is a Nazi style communal outfit so intense in its hatred towards Muslims that its fascist guru, Bal Thackeray, forbade the Pakistani cricket team from playing in its power base city of Mumbai a few years ago. In order to promote the Hindutva brand of militant Hindu fundamentalism, the BJP led state government of Rajisthan organized a massive celebration on 18 Jun 97 of the 421st anniversary of the 'Battle of Haldighat' to honour Maharana pratab as a Hindu hero for his war against Akbar, the Mughal emperor. An Indian Hindu journalist, C.P Bhambhri, in New Delhi's 'Hindustan Times' of 31 Jul 97 comments, "The BJP, RSS, VHP and other allied organisations, without any shadow of doubts are using the culture and history of India to Promote the concept of a Hindu nation which was a victim of Muslim rulers and their purpose is to consolidate Hinduism around a specific religious ethos selectively chosen by political leaders" .He further writes that "The BJP hate list of Muslims continues to unify the Hindus against their religious enemy as revealed by Indian history, the BJP will like to re-write the constitution for establishing a strong Hindu state".

Replacement of Muslim names by Hindus'
The Maharashtra government's hostility to Muslims under the BJP- Shiv Sena ministry has been so blatant in recent years that the old towns bearing Muslim names are being systematically given Hindu colour. The historic city of Aurangabad, once ruled by Muslims has been named as 'Sambhajinagar' to honour the family of the anti Mughal Shivaji. Similarly a very old city of Osmanabad is being given a Hindu name. Eliminating the Muslim names of many other towns is on the Shiv Sena's agenda.
Anti-Muslim roits.

Anti-Muslim roits are a common feature in India. Some of the recent ones are as follows:-

In the state of Gjurat, which the BJP ruled till Sep 96, the Muslim minority has been incessantly terrorized and victimized. Mumbai's 'Economic and political weekly' of 26 Jul 97, published horrifying accounts of the murder of many Muslims in the village of Kukas in Mahesana district last June. On 29 Jun, truckloads of armed Hindu 'chaudharies' attacked the Muslims in kukas, hurling filthy abuses on them, burnt their houses and hacked to death with knives many of them.
In many districts of Gujrat, there are pockets of 25 to 30 Muslim families who are subjected to periodic terrorization and arson. Teenage Muslim girls from poverty-stricken peasant families are either forcibly bought or kidnapped for prostitution in Bombay or Smuggled to oil rich gulf states for slavery.
Deploring the plight of Muslims in Gujrat, an Indian journalist Satyakam Joshi, wrote in Mumbai's 'Economic and political weekly' (26 Jul 97), "The rise of the BJP and its front organizations in Gujrat after 1980 has come as a blow to Muslims who are being reduced relentlessly to a second class citizenship. Their legitimate demands are not on the state agenda. Their harassment by the Hindu fundamentalist forces, remains unmitigated. To considerable extent, the fundamentalist forces have been able to channelise the middle class Hindu psyche against them".

In the anti-Muslim riots in Maharashtra, specially Mumbai, armed marauders of the 'Army of Shiva' had inflicted death and destruction on terror striken Muslims while the police was looking on indifferently or even conniving with the Hindu extremists in killing Muslims of Mumbai.
Discrimination against Muslim community in services: According to 1991 nationwide census., Muslims constitute 12.60 percent of the total Indian population. However, the representation of Muslims in the parliament, state legislatures, administrative services, armed forces, police and para military forces, educational institutions and the private and public sectors is far below their proportion. The percentage of the Muslims in the civil and foreign services is less than a quarter of their population. According to a white paper, prepared by All India Milli council (AIMC) and presented to Prime Minister Inder Kumar Gujral, on the performance of Indian Union during last 50 years, there were only 116 Muslims out of a total of 3883 administrative officers ( 2.98%), 45 out of 1433 police service officers (3.14%) and 57 out of 2159 foreign service officers (2.64%). In central government, Muslims constitute 1.6% of all class I officers, 3.9% of all class II officers and 4.4% of the technical supervisory staff. According to an official report prepared by Dr. Gopal Singh Committee, there is a marked disparity between Hindus and Muslims in economic, social and educational field. The committee's report based on a sample survey of 80 districts across the country, found that there were only 92 Muslims out of 2698 students in Engineering colleges. The number of Muslim students in the MBBS course in 8 universities of eight states was only 98 out of 2895.
Conclusion

The Muslims of India are in a state of dilemma, whether to accept humility in the form of Indian nationalism (based on secular ideas) or to preserve their Muslim identity. They have to rationalise whether by accepting the secular nationalism they will be given equal status like Hindus or will they remain aliens as they are. The Hindu desire to absorb the Muslims into Hinduism through Indian nationalism still persists. They have already done this with Jainism and Buddhism and they are working on other communities living in India as well.

http://imc-usa.org/cgi-bin/cfm/minorities.cfm

Let the truth come to light
--Mohammad Zainal Abedin
It is a regrettable matter that anti-Bangladesh forces in India and elsewhere are so blind and biased that they are reluctant to listen to the truth about the real position of the Bangladeshi minority communities, if that truth is unveiled even by the Indians. These forces know that if any person, particularly an India, speaks the truth and negates media propaganda about the alleged and imaginary atrocities on the Bangladeshi minorities, sensible people around the world will believe that and the real motive of the anti-Bangladesh forces will be uncovered. For this reason, anti-Bangladesh forces in India adopt every possible means to discourage, even deter those sensible and humanist Indians, who endeavour to stand for justice and true and for Bangladesh. But virtue proclaims itself.
 
One of the inherent instincts of human being is to speak the truth and stand for the truth. Any judicious person loves to uncover the truth. But unfortunately a section of people belonging to anti-Bangladesh camp seems to forget this universal quality of an individual. Due to their communal and anti-Bangladesh mentality and to gain personal interest, they feel severe irritation if anyone tries to uncover the truth about Bangladesh and her people. One such incident occurred in Calcutta on February 11.
 
A teacher of Jadavpur University of India was seriously insulted and humiliated in public in Calcutta on that day for his comment on Bangladesh. Dr. Chittabrata Palit, a teacher of the History Department of Jadavpur was insulted in public and forced to stop his speech and leave the dais for speaking the truth that went in favour of Bangladesh.
 
The incident occurred at the second International Human Rights Conference of a Calcutta-based organisaiton 'Campaign Against Atrocities on Minorities in Bangladesh' (CAAMB) held at Baliganj Education Secretariat of Calcutta on February 11, the first day of the 2-day long conference. The conference was ogranised as part of anti-Bangladesh campaign. CAAMB invited a number of very selective anti-Bangladesh speakers from Bangladesh and India.
Among others former Indian Army Chief General Shankar Roy Chowdhury, Vice- Chancellor of Calcutta University Prof. Shantosh Battacharjee, leader of Bangladesh Hindu-Buddhist-Christian Unity Council (BHBCUC) Rana Das Gupta, leader of Hotline Bangladesh Rosalyn Costa, Advocate of Bangladesh Supreme Court Rabindra Gosh, Matriy Chattarjee, Prof. Chittabrata Palit, Dr. Ajoy Roy of Dhaka University attended.
 
Addressing the conference almost all the speakers quoting imaginary and baseless incidents of atrocities on the minority Bangladeshi Hindus delivered extreme anti-Bangladesh speeches, which were the main objective of the conference. But the deliberation of Prof. Chittbrata Palit, a teacher of Jadavpur University of West Bengal was exceptional in nature and beyond the theme of the conference. He narrated his personal experiences he had when he visited Bangladesh.
 
Narrating his experience he said, he accompanied an American Historian to see his (Palit's) forefather's house in Khulna of Bangladesh. Prof. Palit said, though he migrated to India many years ago, he was charmed at the heartiest love and respect of the local Muslims that they expressed seeing him in their locality after so many years. He said, it is not true that the Muslims always oppress and humiliate the Hindus. Citing another experience Prof. Palit said, he went to visit Brahmanbaria along with that American historian to investigate an alleged incident of atrocities on the minority Hindus. But after investigation they found that the allegation of anti-Hindu atrocities was not true and correct. He said, the slain Hindu, was actually killed by his Hindu relatives due to their row over a landed property. But his murder was branded as an act of anti-Hindu atrocity.
 
Having heard his experiences, a good number of audiences were outburst with agitation. They branded Prof. Palit as an agent of Bangladesh and rebuked him using abusive language. Prof. Palit tried to defend himself saying that in a democratic system every individual enjoys the right and liberty to express his own opinion. He asked whether there was such liberty at that conference. At this stage, the audiences became furious and Prof. Palit was compelled to leave the dais without finishing his speech. It is learnt that the organisers did nothing to save Prof. Palit from the discourteous behaviour of the audiences.
 
The behaviour of the audiences and the organisers of the conference proves none, irrespective of his caste, creed or faith, will be tolerated if he/she goes beyond their prescribed guidelines. Otherwise, how an invited discussant could be insulted in such a humiliating way. Their behaviour also uncovers another truth that what CAAMB and hundreds similar groups propagate the alleged atrocities on the Hindus in Bangladesh are totally fabricated and untrue. This also exposed the inherent intolerance of the Hindu leaders and intellectuals. Still it should be hoped and believed that their falsity will be uncovered and their ugly face will be exposed if not today, but tomorrow, as one cannot keep the truth hidden for ever.*
 


Cultural Diversity is Our Pride
Glimpse of Adivasi Cultures of Bangladesh
The Adivasis of Bangladesh demonstrate unique cultures. Their diverse cultures, languages and traditions contribute profusely to make Bangladesh a culturally rich country. For the past many months SEHD has facilitated interaction of different peoples and cultures. Partha Shankar Saha has been closely following these peoples of different cultures and has recorded some features of the selected peoples and their cultures. Philip Gain writes an introduction to go with his report. Sayeeda Saani has helped in the translation of Partha's report.

The Adivasis of Bangladesh demonstrate unique cultures, traditions, knowledge and much more. Their diverse cultures, languages and traditions contribute profusely to make Bangladesh a culturally rich country. Eleven indigenous communities in the southeast [Chittagong Hill Tracts; Santal, Oraon, Munda, Malo, Mahato, Koch, Rajbangshi in the north; the Garos and Hajongs in the north-central plains; Monipuri, Khasi, Patra and tea garden communities in the northeast; and Rakhaings in the coastal districts of Cox's Bazar, Barguna and Patuakhali districts have distinct features in their cultural life. Bangladesh can surely take pride in its diverse cultural life with such distinct indigenous peoples. Their languages and cultures also enrich the language and cultural life of the majority Bengalis. The boundary of cultural life goes far beyond stage performance of dances, songs and drama. Language, knowledge, thought, belief, tradition, technology, behavior, morality, rights, festivals-all these are parts of the cultural life of a human community. Protection of cultures cannot be limited to mere efforts for the protection of dances, songs and dramas. If a community's right to land, local resources, education and practice of traditions in their own language, and use of knowledge and local technologies are not secure, efforts for protection of culture become meaningless.
Adivasis belonging to different corners of Bangladesh are disadvantaged and marginal peoples today. In many instances, they have lost their identities and languages. This has severe consequences in their social, political, economic and cultural life. They have become defenseless, excluded and are compelled to assimilate in many instances.
It is a tough struggle to provide political protection to the Adivasi life and culture. While State attention and policy are much needed for the protection of the Adivasis, increased human communication of the cultural majority with these cultural minorities is imperative. If the common masses have greater understanding of the Adivasi cultural diversity, they can play a role in influencing the state attention in the favor of the Adivasis. With this in mind the Society for Environment and Human Development (SEHD) that has been working closely with the indigenous communities has initiated a programme (from April 2004) for the promotion of the cultural diversity of the indigenous communities of Bangladesh. The programme is intended to facilitate (i) interaction and solidarity among peoples of different cultures, (ii) sharing of life and cultural experiences between the cultural majority and ethnic minority communities, and (iii) creation of positive impression about the cultural world of the indigenous communities among the members of the cultural majority in particular.
In a workshop on 29 May 2004, which brought together representatives of as many as 20 ethnic groups and those of Christian Aid (sponsoring organisation), partner organisations, the participants agreed to organise cultural groups and participate in cultural exchange programmes in different districts in the plains. They also agreed to participate in a cultural festival to be held in Dhaka at an appropriate time.
Following the decisions taken at the workshop in May 2004 and subsequent meetings, eight cultural exchange programmes have been organised in different districts. From these cultural programmes, one can get a glimpse of the cultural lives of selected indigenous communities.
The Santal and Oraon
The Santal and the Oraon are two major indigenous peoples of the North Bengal (Rajshahi, Dinajpur, Rangpur, Thakurgaon, Bogra and Sirajganj districts). The history and culture of these two ethnic communities, who were among the first people to populate India, is old and rich. In course of time and under pressure, many of the elements of their cultures are disappearing. They still try hard to keep their distinct cultural heritage. The cultures of these two peoples contain diverse rites and rituals.
Some Festivals of the Oraon
Fagua Festival: Bengali Falgun (February-March) month is the first month of the Oraon calendar. Summer starts on from this month. Fagua festival is celebrated on the last day of the Falgun month. In the night of this day they set branches of different trees on the ground and hang some hay in these branches; then they set fire on the hay. The Oraons think that this festival symbolizes the death of mother earth.
Sarhul Festival: This ceremony is celebrated in the Bengali month of Chaitra (March-April). The Oraon arrange this (spring) festival in case of rain or intense drought. In Chaitra, if there is a desire of rain, pitchers filled with water, are kept in the village heads' houses. As the Oraon girls come dancing to these houses, the water is poured in them. The Oraons believe that this act will bring the rains. If more rain is desired, Pahan (the village head) and his wife sit beside each other and vermilion is smeared on their forehead. This is a symbolic marriage of earth and sky. Then water is poured on their head and the villagers cry out by saying, barso barso meaning let there be rain so that the land becomes fertile and produces huge quantity of crops.
Karam Festival: Karam is a major festival of the Oraons. This festival is held in the Bengali month of Bhadra (July-August). To celebrate this festival, the Oraon cut a branch of a Karam tree and set it on the ground. Then they worship it with songs and dances. The Oraons believe that the Karam tree is equal to the protector. They believe that in the past when they were driven by the Arayans, this Karam tree gave them refuge. From then on, out of gratitude, they celebrate this Karam festival. This festival brings the Oraon together.
Sohrai Festival: This festival is celebrated on the day of the new moon in the Bengali month of Kartik. This occasion is held on the day of Diwali, a festival of the Hindus. On the day of this festival, the domestic animals (believed to be gifts of God Dharmesh)-cows, buffalos, goats, lambs, which help in cultivation are given baths and smeared with vermilion and oil. The tools used in agriculture are also cleaned and smeared with vermilion. The animals are served a lunch of rice mixed with Maskalai, a kind of pulse. The family members share the same food for lunch. Cowshed is thoroughly cleaned. The Oraon are primarily agriculturists. The festival is arranged to express thanks and gratitude to the artefacts used in agriculture.
(To be continued)

http://www.weeklyholiday.net/cul.html

 

 
 
©2005 South Asia Focus

News Flash | Media Analysis | SAARC | Migration | Political Burning | Foreign Relations | Communal Harmony
Trade and Economy | Tourism | Commentary | Photo Gallery | Archive | Site Map | Contact Us |
About Us